Good
afternoon friends and colleagues.
The National
electronic Library for Health (NeLH) is a developing digital library of
evidence-based health information. Its main users are healthcare professionals
but it will increasingly be open to the public in the United Kingdom.
I am very pleased
to be here to tell you about this programme. I bring good wishes to you
from Dr Ben Toth and Dr Muir Gray.
Our paper will
review the first three years of development including the policy background;
funding issues; integration with existing services; content acquisition;
and access management.
The presentation
will focus on a number of key challenges that have faced the NeLH. These
include; funding; the skills gap in the population for whom the library
is intended; content purchase and access management; links with related
electronic information services such as the DNER (Distributed National
Electronic Resource) in the Higher Education sector; the People's Network
(public library programme); NHS Direct Online and an NHS 'Virtual Classroom'
for e-learning as well as the need for links with electronic health records
and other projects within the NHS Information for health Strategy,
and the impact of political devolution on plans for a UK wide service.
The
policy background begins with an 'Information Age' government with plans
to modernise and improve all its services - including health - by using
information and communication technologies. This is reflected in the NHS
information strategy Information for health which was published
in 1998 and updated at the start of this year. This strategy includes targets
for access to the internet; online appointments booking and telemedicine.
The NHS Plan, published last year, and recent government statements announce
the need to extend best practice throughout the health service. National
programmes will be balanced by the transfer of power and resources to the
NHS 'frontline' Primary Care Trusts.
The
National electronic Library for Health mission is to offer fast and easy
access to best current knowledge to clinicians, managers and the public.
We have used the concept of a library to illustrate access to different
'floors' for clinicians and the public.
Access to licensed
content is from passwords via the Athens Management System which is widely
used in higher education.
The Library has a Content Development Policy and content for the Library is reviewed by a peer review group. Current content includes Clinical Evidence; The Cochrane Library; NHS Research databases;Clinical Guidelines published by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence; Evidence Base on Call and commissioned research summaries that investigate current health news stories in the popular press.
Funding for the National electronic Library is complex.
The project
team had to bid against other service priorities to establish a funding
base for the NeLH. Last year some funds were made available from a special
Modernisation Fund. This is a crucial year for the Library as it has to
complete a full business case to convince The Treasury that this is cost
effective and worthwhile for the NHS budget.
The NeLH project needs
to develop clear links to electronic patient records and clinical systems
projects which are in their infancy. We also need to show that we can offer
effective support for National Service Frameworks for Cancer, Mental Health
and other NHS priorities. This requires us to know about and work with
a wide range of health policy makers and professionals.
We also see it is important to develop
close links with our sister project NHS Direct Online and existing NHS
library and knowledge services and the developing electronic Library for
Social Care.
NeLH has links with the
higher education DNER and with the People's Network for Public Libraries,
as well as other national services such as the British Library, BMA and
others.
NeLH has achieved a great
deal, especially since the launch of the pilot service in November last
year. The range of content continues to expand and the library is actively
supporting clinical governance. Virtual Branch Libraries offer access to
core information for specialist communities of interest. Fast links exist
to NHS Direct Online, nhs.uk and other key sites, and there are joint programmes
with NHS and other library services.
Many difficult challenges
remain. The NHS does not have a consistent, universal publishing policy
for its own information. Sustained funding will not be secure until the
Business Case is approved. Some NHS staff are unconfident using electronic
and virtual library services. Access to internet or intranet based services
is not readily available to all NHS staff. Publishers, until recently,
have dealt with individual libraries or area-based consortia. National
purchasing presents challenges to publishers, subscription agents, and
the NHS itself. Political devolution has complicated planning and service
delivery on a UK wide basis. There are many, well funded, competitors keen
to capture the lead in health information provision.
|